registry@eftasurv.int<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/address>\r\n","footer-top":"The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) monitors compliance with European Economic Area rules in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, enabling them to participate in the European Internal Market.<\/p>\r\n"},"menu":[{"name":"ESA at a glance","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Mission and Values","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/mission-values","route":"node"},{"name":"College Members","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/college-members","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Ad hoc College Members","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/college-members\/ad-hoc-college-members","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Staff directory","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/staff-directory","route":"node"},{"name":"EEA Agreement","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/eea-agreement","route":"node"},{"name":"Data protection","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/data-protection","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Register of data processing activities","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/data-protection\/register","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Publications and documents","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/publications-and-documents","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Publications","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/publications","route":"node"},{"name":"Public document database","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/publications\/public-access-to-documents\/public-documents","route":"node"},{"name":"Public access to documents","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/publications\/public-access-to-documents","route":"node","children":[]}]},{"name":"Events","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/events","route":"node"},{"name":"Visiting ESA","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/visiting-esa","route":"node"},{"name":"Contact","url":"\/esa-at-a-glance\/contact","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Internal Market","url":"\/internal-market","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Implementing EEA law into national law","url":"\/internal-market\/implementing-eea-law-national-law","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Internal Market Scoreboards","url":"\/internal-market\/implementing-eea-law-national-law\/internal-market-scoreboards","route":"node"},{"name":"Implementation Status Database","url":"\/internal-market\/implementing-eea-law-national-law\/implementation-status-database","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Notifications and applications","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Professional Qualifications","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/professional-qualifications","route":"node"},{"name":"Services Directive","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/services-directive","route":"node"},{"name":"Rapid alert systems","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/rapid-alert-system","route":"node"},{"name":"Draft technical regulations","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/draft-technical-regulations","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Draft Technical Notifications","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/draft-technical-regulations\/list","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Biocides","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/biocides","route":"node"},{"name":"Public procurement","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/public-procurement","route":"node"},{"name":"Monitoring organisations","url":"\/internal-market\/notifications-and-applications\/monitoring-organisations","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Internal Market complaints","url":"\/internal-market\/complaints","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Internal market complaint form","url":"\/internal-market\/complaints\/form","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Food and veterinary","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Animal health and welfare","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/animal-health-and-welfare","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Declarations","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/animal-health-and-welfare\/declarations","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Food and feed safety","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/food-and-feed-safety","route":"node"},{"name":"Import controls","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/import-controls","route":"node"},{"name":"Seeds","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/seeds","route":"node"},{"name":"Food and veterinary audits","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/food-safety-missions","route":"node"},{"name":"Annual reports and Country profiles","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/country-profiles","route":"node"},{"name":"Animal health, food and feed safety decisions","url":"\/internal-market\/food-safety\/food-safety-decisions","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Transport","url":"\/internal-market\/transport","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Passenger rights","url":"\/internal-market\/transport\/passenger-rights","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Environment and energy","url":"\/internal-market\/environment-and-energy","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Energy","url":"\/internal-market\/environment-and-energy\/energy","route":"node"},{"name":"Emissions and climate change","url":"\/internal-market\/environment-and-energy\/emissions-and-climate-change","route":"node"},{"name":"Environment","url":"\/internal-market\/environment-and-energy\/environment","route":"node"},{"name":"Land use, land use change and forestry","url":"\/internal-market\/lulucf","route":"node"}]},{"name":"EEA EFTA Separation Agreement with the UK","url":"\/internal-market\/eea-efta-separation-agreement-uk","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Rights granted under the Separation Agreement","url":"\/internal-market\/eea-efta-separation-agreement-uk\/rights-granted-under-separation-agreement","route":"node"},{"name":"Annual reports","url":"\/internal-market\/eea-efta-separation-agreement-uk\/annual-reports","route":"node"}]},{"name":"The Internal Market and COVID-19","url":"\/internal-market\/internal-market-and-covid-19","route":"node"}]},{"name":"State aid","url":"\/state-aid","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Legal framework","url":"\/state-aid\/legal-framework","route":"node"},{"name":"State aid guidelines","url":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-guidelines","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Archive","url":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-guidelines\/archive","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Rates applicable to EFTA States","url":"\/state-aid\/rates","route":"node"},{"name":"State aid register","url":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-register","route":"node"},{"name":"Preliminary assessments","url":"\/state-aid\/preliminary-assessments","route":"node"},{"name":"General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER)","url":"\/state-aid\/gber-information-sheets","route":"node"},{"name":"State Aid Scoreboards","url":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-scoreboards","route":"node"},{"name":"SGEI Reports","url":"\/state-aid\/efta-states-reports-application-sgei-decision","route":"node"},{"name":"Transparency","url":"\/state-aid\/transparency","route":"node"},{"name":"Notification procedures","url":"\/state-aid\/notification-procedures","route":"node"},{"name":"State aid complaints","url":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-complaints","route":"node"},{"name":"Private enforcement","url":"\/state-aid\/private-enforcement","route":"node"},{"name":"State aid rules and COVID-19","url":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-rules-covid-19","route":"node"},{"name":"State aid rules following Russia's invasion of Ukraine and transition to net-zero economy","url":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-rules-ukraine-crisis","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Competition","url":"\/competition","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Leniency","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-in-the-eea\/leniency","route":"node"},{"name":"Competition rules in the EEA","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-in-the-eea","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Legal framework & guidance","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-in-the-eea\/legal-framework-and-guidance","route":"node"},{"name":"ESA's jurisdiction","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-in-the-eea\/esa-jurisdiction","route":"node"},{"name":"Best practices, notices and guidelines","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-in-the-eea\/best-practices-notices-and-guidelines","route":"node"},{"name":"Hearing Officer & procedural rights","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-in-the-eea\/hearing-officer-and-procedural-rights","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Competition cases","url":"\/competition\/competition-cases","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Sector inquiries","url":"\/competition\/competition-cases\/sector-inquiries","route":"node"}]},{"name":"How to make a complaint","url":"\/competition\/how-to-make-a-complaint","route":"node"},{"name":"National cooperation","url":"\/competition\/national-cooperation","route":"node"},{"name":"EEA cooperation","url":"\/competition\/eea-cooperation","route":"node"},{"name":"Inspections","url":"\/competition\/inspections","route":"node"},{"name":"International cooperation networks","url":"\/competition\/international-cooperation","route":"node"},{"name":"Competition rules and COVID-19","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-covid-19","route":"node"},{"name":"Competition rules and the Ukraine crisis","url":"\/competition\/competition-rules-ukraine-crisis","route":"node"},{"name":"eCom","url":"\/competition\/ecom-notifications","route":"node","children":[{"name":"eCom registry","url":"\/competition\/ecom-notifications\/ecom-documents","route":"node"}]}]},{"name":"Newsroom","url":"\/newsroom","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Updates","url":"\/newsroom\/updates","route":"node"},{"name":"Logo, photos and videos\u00a0","url":"\/newsroom\/logo-photos-videos","route":"node"},{"name":"Communications contact","url":"\/newsroom\/communications-contact","route":"node"}]},{"name":"Careers","url":"\/careers","route":"node","children":[{"name":"Current vacancies","url":"https:\/\/jobs.eftasurv.int\/vacancies.html","route":"external"},{"name":"Guidelines for applicants","url":"\/careers\/guidelines-for-applicants","route":"node"},{"name":"Recruitment policy","url":"\/careers\/recruitment-policy","route":"node"},{"name":"Junior Professionals Programme","url":"\/careers\/junior-professionals-programme","route":"node"},{"name":"Working at ESA","url":"\/careers\/working-at-esa","route":"node"},{"name":"Candidate Portal ","url":"https:\/\/jobs.eftasurv.int\/login.html","route":"external"},{"name":"Register","url":"https:\/\/jobs.eftasurv.int\/register.html","route":"external"},{"name":"Staff portraits - Interview with Johanne F\u00f8rde","url":"\/careers\/staff-portraits-interview-johanne-forde","route":"node"},{"name":"Staff portraits - Interview with Per Arvid Sj\u00f8g\u00e5rd","url":"\/careers\/staff-portraits-interview-arvid-sjogard","route":"node"}]}],"data":{"node":{"type":"press_release","title":"State aid: Norway's participation in credit facility in favour of SAS approved","alias":"\/newsroom\/updates\/state-aid-norways-participation-credit-facility-favour-sas-approved","language":"en","languages":["en","nb"],"body":"
Today, the EFTA Surveillance Authority closed a formal investigation regarding a Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) granted to Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) in 2012.<\/p>
SAS enjoyed in recent years an RCF provided by several banks, which was to expire in June 2013. The banks refused to renew this RCF without a substantial participation from the main shareholders of SAS, namely Sweden (21.4%), Denmark (14.3%), Norway (14.3%) and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation (KAW) (7.6%).<\/span> In December 2012, the three States decided to finance half of a new RCF of SEK 3.5 billion (around \u20ac400 million), together with KAW and the majority of the banks that participated in the old RCF. The measure is linked to the implementation of SAS's new business plan.<\/span><\/p> After having received a complaint, the Authority opened a formal investigation to assess the conformity of the measure with EEA state aid rules. Given the particular situation involving these three States, of which two are EU members, the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the European Commission have conducted parallel investigations in close cooperation with each other. The Authority has now concluded that Norway's participation in the RCF does not constitute state aid.<\/p>
\u201cOur thorough investigation conducted in cooperation with the European Commission showed that Norway's participation in this credit facility does not involve state aid but rather reflects a commercial decision guided by prospects of profitability in the prevailing circumstances\u201d,<\/em> Oda Helen Sletnes, president of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, said.<\/span><\/p> In its investigation, ESA found that the three States and the banks were not in a comparable position when deciding to participate in the new RCF, in particular in view of the exposure of some of the banks towards SAS beyond the RCF. However, the investigation has also established the robustness of the underlying assumptions of the business plan. Indeed, the plan has been reviewed by external advisers who confirmed its credibility. Moreover, the risks taken by the States were further reduced as the collateral of the new RCF was sufficient.<\/p>
On this basis, ESA considers that the new RCF was concluded on terms that a private investor operating under market conditions would have accepted. It therefore procured no undue economic advantage to SAS and did not entail state aid.<\/p>
The new RCF was never used and was effectively cancelled on 4 March 2014.<\/span> <\/span> <\/span><\/p> The European Commission has adopted a parallel decision concerning Sweden and Denmark's participation in the RCF. For further information see the website of DG Competition<\/a>.<\/p> A non-confidential version of today's Decision will be published in the<\/span> register of state aid decisions<\/a><\/span> <\/span>on the Authority's website, normally within a month.<\/span><\/p> <\/strong><\/p> For further information, please contact:<\/p>
Mr. Andreas Kjeldsberg Pihl<\/a><\/em> Press & Information Officer tel. (+32)(0)2 286 18 66 <\/span>mob. (+32)(0)492 900 187<\/p> <\/p>","summary":"Today, the EFTA Surveillance Authority closed a formal investigation regarding a Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) granted to Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) in 2012. SAS enjoyed in recent years an RCF provided by several banks, which was to expire in June 2013. The banks refused to renew this RCF without a substantial participation from the main shareholders of SAS, namely Sweden (21.4%),...","date":1404907200,"relatedContent":[{"type":"decision","title":"The financing of Scandinavian Airlines through the new Revolving Credit Facility","alias":"\/state-aid\/state-aid-register\/financing-scandinavian-airlines-through-new-revolving-credit-facility","date":1404907200}],"theme":{"id":28,"title":"State Aid","weight":2},"number":"PR(14)44"}},"dataStatus":"success"}};
You need to enable JavaScript to run this app. State aid: Norway's participation in credit facility in favour of SAS approved Today, the EFTA Surveillance Authority closed a formal investigation regarding a Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) granted to Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) in 2012.
SAS enjoyed in recent years an RCF provided by several banks, which was to expire in June 2013. The banks refused to renew this RCF without a substantial participation from the main shareholders of SAS, namely Sweden (21.4%), Denmark (14.3%), Norway (14.3%) and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation (KAW) (7.6%). In December 2012, the three States decided to finance half of a new RCF of SEK 3.5 billion (around €400 million), together with KAW and the majority of the banks that participated in the old RCF. The measure is linked to the implementation of SAS's new business plan.
After having received a complaint, the Authority opened a formal investigation to assess the conformity of the measure with EEA state aid rules. Given the particular situation involving these three States, of which two are EU members, the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the European Commission have conducted parallel investigations in close cooperation with each other. The Authority has now concluded that Norway's participation in the RCF does not constitute state aid.
“Our thorough investigation conducted in cooperation with the European Commission showed that Norway's participation in this credit facility does not involve state aid but rather reflects a commercial decision guided by prospects of profitability in the prevailing circumstances”, Oda Helen Sletnes, president of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, said.
In its investigation, ESA found that the three States and the banks were not in a comparable position when deciding to participate in the new RCF, in particular in view of the exposure of some of the banks towards SAS beyond the RCF. However, the investigation has also established the robustness of the underlying assumptions of the business plan. Indeed, the plan has been reviewed by external advisers who confirmed its credibility. Moreover, the risks taken by the States were further reduced as the collateral of the new RCF was sufficient.
On this basis, ESA considers that the new RCF was concluded on terms that a private investor operating under market conditions would have accepted. It therefore procured no undue economic advantage to SAS and did not entail state aid.
The new RCF was never used and was effectively cancelled on 4 March 2014.
The European Commission has adopted a parallel decision concerning Sweden and Denmark's participation in the RCF. For further information see the website of DG Competition .
A non-confidential version of today's Decision will be published in the register of state aid decisions on the Authority's website, normally within a month.
For further information, please contact:
Mr. Andreas Kjeldsberg Pihl Press & Information Officer tel. (+32)(0)2 286 18 66 mob. (+32)(0)492 900 187
You may also be interested in